- Added Vector3OrthoNormalize() to raymath.h - not sure if it is correct
- Implemented MeshBinormals() - Mesh struct has not a place for them...
- Updated model_material_pbr example - tested but not working on my GPU
(old Intel HD), actually, it never worked on it...
Reported in #435, tcc generates out-of-line definitions for inline
symbols, something it shouldn't. This fix punishes tcc for that
by making applications it compiles (slightly) larger...
RAYMATH_EXTERN_INLINE was renamed to RAYMATH_HEADER_ONLY, which user code
may define if they want to use it as header-only library. If multiple
files in the same project define RAYMATH_HEADER_ONLY, they might each
have duplicate out-of-line definitions of the same functions.
By default, raymath.h exposes inline definitions, which instructs the
compiler _not_ to generate out-of-line definitons, if out-of-line
definitions are required, those of the file defined with
RAYLIB_IMPLEMENTATION are used instead. There may be only one such file.
In C++ mode, the compiler will select only one out-of-line definition
automatically, so no need to define a RAYLIB_IMPLEMENTATION.
Unfortunately, we have to remove raymath function declaration from
raylib.h as those declarations would lead to duplicate out-of-line
definitions which would yield linker errors. This problem didn't
exist with GNU89 or C++, because there multiple defintions are ok,
but in C99 they aren't.
RAYMATH_EXTERN_INLINE was renamed to RAYMATH_HEADER_ONLY, which user code
may define if they want to use it as header-only library. If multiple
files in the same project define RAYMATH_HEADER_ONLY, they might each
have duplicate out-of-line definitions of the same functions.
By default, raymath.h exposes inline definitions, which instructs the
compiler _not_ to generate out-of-line definitons, if out-of-line
definitions are required, those of the file defined with
RAYLIB_IMPLEMENTATION are used instead. There may be only one such file.
In C++ mode, the compiler will select only one out-of-line definition
automatically, so no need to define a RAYLIB_IMPLEMENTATION.
Unfortunately, we have to remove raymath function declaration from
raylib.h as those declarations would lead to duplicate out-of-line
definitions which would yield linker errors. This problem didn't
exist with GNU89 or C++, because there multiple defintions are ok,
but in C99 they aren't.